Disputandum Debate
The reason why dictatorship is seen in such a bad light in comparison to democracy is that its worst examples are used to define it. With that being said, how do you defend dictatorship?
Many of us are taught about principle and practical arguments to strategise during casebuild. There are actually four other things you need to know…
We all know everything about what’s trending currently, but do we know how to debate trend motions?
A structured argument is easier to follow by judges and audiences. Here’s a pocket-sized tip for a structured principle argument.
Top teams don’t think of incredibly innovative arguments, they’re probably going to be the same arguments you’d think of six months into debating. The difference is really in how they construct the world behind it.
Differentiating principle and practical arguments, and separating them, helps you make a more nuanced and non-repetitive case.
Picture a scenario where you’re drowning. The man in front of you will only save you if you throw him your wallet. Fair trade, but is this moral?
All early debaters, including me to a great extent, have a similar struggle. We don’t know what we’re talking about.
A good stance is powerful. It allows you to run effective arguments and to prevent your opponents from misrepresenting you.
Experts around the world are presuming China’s move to “expand” to Afghanistan. However, instead of using military might, China would likely depend on developmental peace.