Category: Choice and Philosophy

This note is a full-copy paste from markmanson.net/love.

This note will explain the two most commonly used framework to analyze principle arguments; utilitarianism and deontology. Source: https://medium.com/@AuliaAnggita/navigating-the-shades-of-gray-6e28063d4731

This note will discuss principles revolving property rights, which asserts that someone has the right to consume, alter, and transfer ownership of their properties (“property” includes a lot of things: Cars, debt papers, even one’s own body) peacefully, without coercion by anyone.

Is everything completely terrible – or is the world getting better? It’s a popular topic of debate, because both claims seem to be true.

This note will discuss how marriage proposals is a bad way to move forward with a relationship. Source: https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/03/marriage-proposals-are-stupid/556403/

Source: https://aeon.co/essays/is-neuroscience-getting-closer-to-explaining-evil-behaviour

This note will discuss the framework to analyze the principle of statehood.

This one is rather straightforward so let’s get straight to the points. This article is written by Boby Andika Ruitang.

This note will discuss and debunk several arguments made in favor of limiting people’s privacy for the sake of security. Written by Rifan Ibnu Rahman.

The harm principle basically states that your action can only be limited through state (law intervention) or society (moral coercion) by the time it harms others.